Gringo derogatory prejudice language. Activism usage In 1969, Jose Angel Gutierrez (one of the 5 leaders of the Mexican American Youth Organization) said his and MAYO's use of the term, rather than referring to non-Latinos, instead referred to institutions or persons with attitudes or policies/programs that reflect bigotry, discord, prejudice, racism and violence.
Megyn Kelly, a news model on FoxNews discussing a proposed ban on Ethnic Studies in Texas, actually said on TV that “gringo” is JUST as offensive as the N-word. That anybody over at Fox News called what they do “News” is more offensive than the “G” word.
I don't know where it originates from, if that's what you wanted to know, but yes, "spade" is a derogatory term for a black person.
A derogatory term for an African American, more commonly used in the post-Civil War era than today.
No you can't sit with me, you damn spade. slang spade black person It is only in the past century that the phrase began to acquire a negative, racial overtone. So what does all of this mean for people who want to, well, "call a spade a spade"? I urge caution. Mieder concludes his case study with the argument that "to call a spade a spade" should be retired from modern usage: "Rather than taking the chance of unintentionally offending someone or of being misunderstood, it is best to relinquish the old innocuous proverbial expression all together."
An eviction is a very serious matter and is not to be taken lightly - -
The first defense people engage in is to blame their problems on other people. Sometimes it's called scapegoating but it's generally know as projection. It is not only a huge problem but is the worst problem in history.
Many people have always grabbed the power anointed them by embracing the 'weaker sex or party' 'or racist' etc., scenario and leveraging it at every moment they see a gain for themselves. Those who aren't out for glory, are people who project because they believe other people are responsible for their feelings. And many women embrace the notion "Men are responsible for all the problems in the world."
Many people believe they have been excessively oppressed ( not grasping that laws and statutes and rules are in themselves oppressive ) and some simply cant make a good lifestyle for themselves with them in place, yet will embrace governments hand outs ,and feel good they are being given opportunities that never have been afforded them before. Others use illegal or criminal behavior to improve their lives, or better their training and education, and use networking, such as 'girl gangs, criminal gangs, drug gangs, associations, govt or charitable affiliations'.
With power comes responsibility under the laws and rules, as so many people have known and accepted for decades. The trouble is the masses, whether it men or women, etc., don't like being oppressed and have their lives and actions and desires caged in with rules.
People much like computers need programed, and programs or training, to run smoothly... Garbage in and garbage out. With out training a person will journey through their life of hard knocks.
Such is the case before us today MMHA vs DDF.
President Clinton once said on live tv " I never had sexual relations with that women" and later recanted it, and was impeached. Today I stand accused that I had a border (using this word to be all inclusive to flopper, stay over, roommate, etc) - by females once again whirling their power, because they can, ...motivated by hateful and revengeful hearts of hurt feelings, egos bruised, and so forth - .
I can clearly say I never had a border and in fact told suspect person names VKP that she could not board here to save money for her college as it would get me kicked out, and she would need to use her savings to get a simple apt as cheap as she could and start from there or rent a room like college students do and she will be fine.
I suspect because she lost her roommate last year and isn't always happy to live in the southern part of town, and she she feels comfortable and secure in this amazing building and complex, I suspect is something so very familiar to her, in what her dad had provided too her as a child growing up of a modern and a safe haven.
As far as the presidents scenario, and about myself, I am not romantically inclined and neither is VKP to one another, and never have been. And thou we are are NOT blood relatives, she has a history of personal growth and accomplishment and ups and downs in shared spaces with me (and my mother) that gos back many years. The point is I did my diligence in following the polices and she was told she could not bord here, just so she could save money for college, or any other motive she may of had.
Just as Management does now, in turning a blind eye to the rules and policies, applied to other female tenants here, in allowing their boyfriends and lovers and friends and relatives to stay with them, management has and does change the rules and policies of the lease(s) at her discretions and whims.
Just as a mother does who loves her child, she may or will tell them to obey her, and she cant live with mom ( mom has lease contract as well ), and cause she is all grown up now, so her mom has done all her due-diligence in all but physically removing this suspected person thou have rarely seen her there other than being a guest/visitor.
And let me say this clearly; I am not responsible for this suspected persons where abouts in the building or on planet earth.
And now KE and Jodi have allowed LKA and VKP, at least another thirty days, to cure the potential for any such problem to arise of that tenant breaking her lease beyond managements permissions and authority, which I knew she would, in this climate of female empowerment vs the law and policies and contracts.
I did my diligence and I had cured it in the beginning, and thus waited for the next shoe to drop by harboring and hunkering down in my dwelling, waiting to be attacked by management once again.
And management did just that and has disturbed my peaceful enjoyment of my dwelling improperly and illegally and unethically.
People sometimes don't forgive or forget.
Example is I forgave DC when she decided to tell the whole truth last summer, and she has received justly I assume, or unjustly an opportunity for management to retaliate against her.
Thus Managements -MOTIVE OF OPERATION- is clearly painting a picture of hostility towards good tenants!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
So Rather than skirting the laws as management does regularly as a management tool, and banking this known ( management gave her permission to come and go as she pleased) but alleged violations, and thus an opportunity for management to wheel her power at her whim, when simply she should follow the laws and rules upfront and never be seen as being .
By practicing this it would be clear the appearance of impropriety would never exist, and that she is merely doing her job and not retaliating as such.
The lines are blurred but the EVENTS ARE CLASSICAL RETALIATION DISDAIN DISCRIMINATION AND PREJUDICE.
We can not stay blinded in that ALL KNOWLEDGE and LIFE EVENTS AND OTHERS EXPERIENCES ARE and is in records ACCESSIBLE ON THE INTERNET !!!
You want to learn womens or mens secrets and motivations and how they think and operate is clearly available, as are the case histories of crimes and criminals and court proceedings and testimonies of the people.
HOW PEOPLE THINK AND ACT TOWARDS OTHERS IS NOT A SECRET !! ITS EXTREMELY TRANSPARENT TODAY !! THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN !!!
We want to believe people are good and we understand people have their own TIME CLOCKS they work in, in their own time. Some people are pushed and have to be pushed (in enforcing the policies in life and of the complex and of the rental agreements) to have to react and decide to do the right thing. This usually comes with maturity and life experience, that its good to learn to plan ahead, something many of us in a poverty or under financial stresses did not learn or embrace in life.
As a federal funded operation, I certainly understand the importance of, and with in reasonable stretches by the tenants and landlords actions, it is good to maintain the peaceful enjoyment of premises and of tenants, and that management will be compassionate but firm, and people will be allowed to live on the edge of the rules.
And some will be given an inch and eventually will take a mile even in increments.
Some tenants will continue to take those increments of trust and get management who is blinded by distractions of their own unethical and unprofessional activities, and when confronted will play their ace in the hole, be leverage a historic good deed(s) in trust using the knowledge they have of other tenants who have or are continuing to break the lease agreements.
These people may in fact be of a criminal mind who seek to gain overtly or by stealth for themselves praise or to be awarded for a job well done, and use in many different forms of personable actions, networking, friendship building, to accomplish this.
Example would be a tenant having bee given extraordinary powers of a 'MASTER KEY' .
Motives exercised, come in many forms by those who seek to blame others - and in leveraging their power of knowledge of past permissions and events (including hurt feelings, and disdain for others exercising their God given inalienable rights and legislated rights in defending illegal actions by persons in this building) . Colluding together of managerial powers is nothing new, when error has been discovered, and the need is greater the crime, to protect one who made a judgmental error, regardless of how it came about or was motivated.
Payback and revenge is nothing new in man kinds book of tricks. What hasn't been exercised well here is shinning the light on truth and factual information, of people of and in a higher authority to base decisions on and moving forward. Colluding an approving such actions by management and administration to once again to turn a blind eye to the truth and live in the truth - theirs rules, and at what point does some one stand up and so we are going to fall of the cliff if we do not reverse this trend. It will catch up to me.
Or they can decide to continue to turn a blind eye to corruptions (not the same as turning the cheek the other way) and actions of perversions of the LAW they are entrusted to uphold. My only authority by the lease agreement was to enforce them in my dwelling - 'you can not over stay and or reside here' - regardless of the good intentioned goal of saving money and good will of others of one suspected person may have been willing to do.
Again another female living on the edge and pressing her luck, just as management did in exercising their authority and permissions given to this suspected person to skate the policies. Once management felt jilted from a tenant to not allow her access for an inspection, - 'get me a legal notice please' - and thus management was pressured back in the request to - FOLLOW THE LAW - set by congress, to give an appropriate notice to tenant. And in trying three tries to serve this notice, she also decided it was time to - PRESSURE BACK USING THE LAWS - for retaliation. She was out for blood. And because she felt unappreciated in her decision in giving of this extension to this suspected person and tenant(s), and now has peddled backwards and is using it as leverage and a weapon of hate and prejudice in her own heart. A WOMEN SCORNED !
I realty what management has done is to project her ow failing on to a tenant - of
"willful misconduct or maladministration … habitual neglect or refusal to perform the duties of her office." in either covering her own mismanagement, and poor judgment with her administrator, or just poor character. Either way her choices and the suspected persons poor choices endangered this tenant as well as another tenants peaceful enjoyment of there dwelling place.
Management gave the suspected boarder the keys and permissions to the kingdom and turned a blind eye, having all the tools at her disposal and with negligence did not or choice not to use them to alert her to such possibilities. Had she been into her job responsibilities this would of been her best tool and yet is her own demise in using it only in cases where she needs to leverage that knowledge for her own good and gain, to see daily the comings and goings of a suspected person(s), but she didn't care until now and crafting her story of -- NEW EVIDENCE -- is simply a SMOKE SCREEN .
What we've got here is a male tenant being held accountable for their alleged behavior
but women not being held accountable for theirs.
Worse, men are only responsible for their behavior but also for women's.
Fact is NO ONE BORDED WITH ME -
I did my diligence to enforce the policies successfully -
Management in their actions have clearly demonstrated MALICE with fore thought -
NO CURE TO FIX GIVEN TO 2 TENANTS -
CURE TO FIX GIVEN TO 2 TENANTS -
An extension of time given to a tenant to finish their progress of fixing the issues.
- discrimination - comes where the THE FIRST NOTICE TO CURE SHOULD OF BEEN GIVEN TO ALL TENANTS and not to 2 for clear fire code issues. YES MANAGEMENT CAN DECIDE IN THEIR AUTHORITY TO DECIDE TO GIVE A NOTICE AND TO WHOM EVER
...........so long as it is not be discriminatory and is equitably applied.
THE LAW IS CLEAR ON SEVERAL POINTS -
PROPER NOTICE BE GIVEN - WAS NOT
BASED ON FACTS NOT GUESSES - NO FACTUAL PHYSICAL PROOF OF EVIDENCE
DECISIONS TO TAKE ACTIONS BASED IN LAW AND NOT THE LAW ENFORCERS WHIMS
CANT CHANGE THE POLICIES FOR ONE OR A FEW AND HOLD IT AGAINST ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL - FAIRNESS AND EQUATABLE IS REQUIRED. LANDLORD GIVES UP THEIR RIGHT TO EVICT THEN
EVIDENCE GATHERED ILLEGALLY BY ILLEGAL SEARCHES IS INADMISSIBLE - 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION IS CLEAR
Between the two - OTHER CAUSES or MATERIAL COMPLIANCE -.. the law says such a violation as a 'border' falls under - OTHER CAUSES- and is not a repeated offense but a single offense. And it is not a disruption of other tenants peaceful enjoyment of their dwellings.
The LAW is clear - -
That a FIRST NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN AND THE TENANT GIVEN THE RIGHT TO CURE FIX the issue before any action of EVICTION be taken out.
This is where the judgment to 'cause action' should have been front and center - laid as the foundational starting of any action and equitably applied when a or any policy is broken - and not the idea that because these are two or more different incidences.
When a LAW is broken the COP gets to decide do I ARREST or DO I NOT ARREST - the LAW is clear - ARREST is the duty and responsibility and is mandatory and applied in equitable of treatment of all suspects involved. Skirting the LAW by discretionary authority is a hard line to walk.
So one has to look deeper into is there a MOTIVE and INFLUENCE, as well as evidence in making such a call.
The overall picture can paint the total picture and i using sound reason and judgment can disclose the truth and truth can prevail - so long as all parties are truly seeking the truth.
So Transparency IS CRUCIAL.
HOW WAS MANAGEMENT MOTIVATED TO MAKE AND TAKE THEIR ACTIONS - -
To say all of us has not been affected by 9/11 would be absurd and a falsehood.
And it is no different in this case and the historical record of these two people involved - tenant and management.
A very negative impact had occurred, and with it came hurt feelings, lies, disdain, disrespect, and illegal if not unethical and immoral actions had been taken by management in my opinion based on the evidence and circumstances, wrapped up in poor judgment, poor character or lack of training of management.
FALSE CLAIMS AND ACCUSATION LAST SUMMER AGAINST TENANT - POOR JUDGMENT AND DISCRIMINATION EXERCISED BY MANAGEMENT STAFF AND AGENTS KE, KC, KB -
(false claim of harassment of other female tenants, false claim of improper use of tenants key, false claim of theft, false claim of stocking, perpetuating slander against this tenant by management, etc)
HARBORED GRUDGES FORMS MANAGEMENTS JUDGMENT -
LATEST HURT FEELINGS OF MANAGEMENT - UNACCESSIBLE INSPECTION - CREATES DISDAIN AND PREJUDICE -
MANAGEMENT ACTION TO EVICT FOR HARBORING A SUSPECTED BORDER - RETALIATION TOOL
NO EVIDENCE OF HARBORING A BOARDER EXISTS - MANAGEMENT CONTINUES IMPROPER PROSECUTION - DISCRIMINATION
2 WITNESSED IN THE PHYSICAL INSPECTIONS - NO EVIDENCE FOUND OR EXISTED - MANAGEMENT CONTINUES IMPROPER PROSECUTION - AND DISCRIMINATION
3 EYE WITNESS ACCOUNTS OF NO BORDER GIVEN IN WRITTEN TESTIMONY STATEMENTS - MANAGEMENT CONTINUES IMPROPER PROSECUTION - DISCRIMINATION
TWO EYE WHITENESS TESTIMONIES GIVEN - NO BORDER EVER EXISTED IN TENANTS DWELLING - MANAGEMENT CONTINUES IMPROPER PROSECUTION - DISCRIMINATION
CHANGES THE LEASE - AGAIN DOESN'T FOLLOW THE FAIR EQUITABLE OF APPLICATION OF THE POLICY - -
GIVES A SECOND PERMISSION FOR THE SUSPECTED BOARDER TO STAY 30 DAYS LONGER IN ONE TENANTS DWELLING -
first permission ' to come and go as you please '
( and eventually will allow the tenant to stay EVEN THOU they - TENANT and suspected border - have not cured the issue, and management allows it to continue ) -
shows continued discrimination of one tenant originally targeted, by changing the policies of the lease of the second tenant.
Shows policies are not applied equitably and fairly . Its OK to have a boarder )
So what is to come of the ORIGINAL TARGETED TENANT - for not allowing a timely inspection to occur ? Thats what are here to day to decide.
I respectfully request that this tenant ;
to be allowed to stay in tenants dwelling -
That tenant NOT be discriminated against ever again -
That the LAW and POLICIES be followed and a first CURE TO FIX NOTICE be given for any and all decisions before an evict action is taken -
That any documents presented to tenant be given to him addressed properly, and
placed upon the door of the tenants dwelling and
or under the door, and mailed by first class mail
as the law prescribes
to eliminate the potential for confusion and feelings injured of and by either tenant or management staffers.
That tenant NOT be harassed with illegal eviction actions ever again -
That tenant be allowed to live and have peaceful enjoyment of their dwelling - free from harassments, by management and tenants.
That corrective actions, and additional training offered up to management staff and disciplinary action be given to management staff up to and including dismissal, due to the serious nature of an eviction that uproots a family person(s) and effects the whole community, (every personable negative action affects more than one party and can instill fear and uncertainty in and amongst that community) and the negligent and reckless conduct and actions by management staff against this innocent tenant which has been allowed to continue by the MMHA Administration -
That the tenant be awarded a sum of $500 for tenants injuries inflicted by management UPON TENANT;
embarrassment suffered caused by management,
discrimination towards and against tenant perpetuated by management,
mental suffering of tenant caused by management,
emotional distress of tenant caused by management,
and punitive damages for the continued perpetuated damages to tenants reputation in tenants community caused by management.
Managements actions are clearly in violation of the LAWS OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT AND STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AS WELL AS FEDERAL LAWS, and done so with suspected malice and reckless disregard for the tenants well being, and the disturbance of the tenants right to their peaceful enjoyment as prescribed by the very ethics and codes of the Charter of the Corporation Of Muscatine, HUD Housing Practices and State Landlord Tenant Law.
.....................................................................................
I bring this up because it is clear in todays political environment, people of unscrupulous nature does take it upon themselves to instigate hate against other individual(s) disguised as official business or citizen concern, to create a hostile atmosphere and becomes the result of BLACK BALLING the targeted individual, by way of anonymous emails, phone calls, conversations, negative comments, etc.. If this is or has occurred it is best it be disclosed and we can deal with it together to stop it, because its impact can be devastating.
